Goju Ryu
has its origins in the teachings of Kanryo Higashionna which were
classified as Naha Te and his personnel way as Shorei Ryu or Enlightened
spirit style. Higashionna's Chinese teachers are by tradition
considered to be Ryu Ryuko, the Chinese teacher of Whooping Crane
(Minghe Quan) and his assistant Wai Shin Zan (also Wan Shin Zan
and Wai Xinxian). Martial Art historian Patrick McCarthy in his
meticulous researches into the origins of Karate has identified
Ryu Ryuko as Xie Chongxian 1852-1930.
Kanryo Higashionna 1853-1917 was just one
of several Okinawan students who travelled to Fuchou in the province
of Fukien, China and studied with Ryu Ryuko.
Yet
before Higashionna went to China, as an adolescent he had studied
Naha Te under karate master Sheisho Aragaki, (also Arakaki (Japanese))1840
- 1920. Aragaki himself is reputed to have studied in Fuchou with
Wai Shin Zan.
Other
contemporaries who studied in Fuchou were Isei Kojo (1832-1891)
and in later years his son Kaho Kojo(1849-1925) both who studied
Kempo with Iwah, a military attache. After being awarded his teachers
licence Kaho Kojo and his assistant Makabe opened a dojo in Fuchou.
Another
member of the Kojo family; Taitei Kojo 1837-1917 studied Kempo
with Wai Shin Zan.
Norisato Nakaima (1850-1927) studied with
Ryu Ryuko from @1860 to 1866 after which he received his teachers
licence. On returning to Okinawa, the teachings were past on in
secret as a family tradition until 1971 when Kenko Nakaima for
the first time taught openly naming it Ryuei-ryu.
Thus
the major influences and the contemporaries of Higashionna may
have looked something like this:
Ryu Ryuko
____|__________
| | |
Iwah Wai Shin Zan | |
| ____|_____ | |
| | | | | |
Isei Kojo | Aragaki | | Norisato Nakaima
| | | | | |
Kahi Kojo - Taitei Kojo | | | Nakaima family
| | | | |
Kojo Family ------------- Higashionna ---------
With
Aragaki introducing Higashionna to the Naha Te kata Sanchin and
Seisan this might suggest that he (Aragaki) learnt these from
Wai Shin Zan. Aragaki may well given the young Higashionna an
introduction to study with Wai Shin Zan in China.
What
is known is that Wai Shin Zan was Ryu Ryuko's assistant but probably
had knowledge of martial styles not practised by Ryu Ryuko who
was still formulating his own method of Crane Boxing.
Students
would often study with multiple teachers learning several martial
arts. In turn they might hand on the individual styles or synthesise
what they know into an eclectic teaching. Wai Shin Zan could have
been teaching a composite style of Peho (Fukien White Crane),
Lohan (Monk Boxing) and Tat Chun(Tamo iron body).It has been suggested
that Wai Shin Zan may have been a teacher of Five Ancestors which
was founded on Peho, Lohan, Kao Kun (monkey boxing), Tai Cho (great
ancestor boxing), and Tat Chun (Tamo iron body)
With
Wai Shin Zan assisting Ryu Ryuko during a period of evolution
this could account for changes between the earlier forms of Aragaki
and the later forms of Higashionna.
Whilst
Higashionna didn't openly teach Ryu Ryuko's crane forms on his
return he was profoundly influenced by the Crane Boxing principles.
The
core of Higashionna's teaching was quite possibly an eclectic
rather than a traditional art. This may have been based on Lohan
boxing and Tamo iron body training integrated with a composite
of Ryu Ryuko's and Wan Shin Zan's Crane boxing.
Whatever
the true origin's are, should they ever be discovered, Higashionna
passed on a synthesis of martial knowledge that is relevant whatever
its source. We can therefore look back in appreciation at the
rich heritage the early Okinawan karate teachers handed down irrespective
of Ryu. Equally we should look forwards and understand that all
karate below the surface is the same, as the differences are but
expressions of a common knowledge.
References:
Fighting Art International: No.87 and No.90
The Black Ship of Karate-Do 'Patrick McCarthy' by Colin Whitehead
and Graham Noble.
Okinawan Karate, 'Teachers, styles and secret
techniques' by Mark Bishop, printed 1989 A&C Black, ISBN 0
7136 5666 2.